DEVELOPING RESEARCH QUESTION

The ripple effect of WikiLeaks brings out questions of privilege. Classified information carries a public perception - a perception shaped by rhetoric. How does Wikileaks take down our perceptions of privilege information? How does Wikileaks create accessibility of information? How is Wikileaks a newspaper? In what ways is Wikileaks interchangeable for a go-to newspaper like, for example, The Guardian? Conducting an analysis of the website will address these questions
     

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"THE VIRTUAL SPHERE" OF PAPACHARISSI

Papachrissi's explains the public sphere in the words of Jurgen Habermas as a forum separate from the public as it relates to opinion and assembly. She quotes on page 5, "Because, according to Habermas, the public sphere has been compromised to the point where its actual existence is in doubt, it is best understood as a metaphor for “a sphere which mediates between society and state in which the public organizes itself as the bearer of public opinion, accords with the principle of the public sphere – that principle of public information which once had to be fought for against the arcane politics of monarchies and which since that time has made possible the democratic control of state activities” (Habermas, 1973, p. 351)." Given this definition I see the public sphere as any communicative forum accessible to the general public (as audience as as speakers) that may include discourse surrounding local and national politics as well as social constructs such as businesses, sc...
Read more

The Fourth Estate’s Digital Evolution: Assessing the Ripple Effects of Wikileaks

Abstract This paper discusses Wikileaks as a digital archive of classified information that contributes to how the Fourth Estate functions in light of recent developments in digital news media. My research considers Wikileaks’ published classified materials on the digital platform in relation to the traditional methods of leaking classified information in journalism. I argue that, through its digital archive, Wikileaks has effectively constructed a network between itself, journalists, citizens and the government. Wikileaks represents a historic development in the dissemination of classified information. Introduction Fundamental processes of democracy involving free speech and a free press have been preserved by whistleblowers engaging with the press throughout history. The significance of the press in assisting public scrutiny and upholding democratic processes is seen in the release of the Pentagon Papers in 1971 by former U.S. military analyst Daniel Ellsberg. 1...
Read more

FIRST DRAFT

WikiLeaks has released classified information from within the US government to the “virtual sphere” which enables public scrutiny of both the leaks and our government (Papacharissi). Furthermore, the dialogues WikiLeaks has generated regarding the issue of leaked US classified documents in virtual spheres, such as online news publications or academic articles, are evidence of the level of value WikiLeaks lends to a public debate over our democracy. Thus, WikiLeaks facilitates a critical relationship between US citizens and their government and strengthens the building blocks of a healthy democracy, which is of course reflected in our constitution with the First Amendment. The digital nature of WikiLeaks assists in circumventing the US government's attempts to contain classified information, thereby placing public knowledge above governmental secrecy. Traditionally speaking, public procurement of leaked information was reliant upon the physical relationships between journalists an...
Read more