ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY FIRST PART
Aharony, Noa. "WikiLeaks comments: a study of responses to articles." Online Information Review 36.6 (2012): 828-845. Web. 29 October 2014.<http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.lib.uwm.edu/docview/1193950884/fulltextPDF?accountid=15078>
The central theme of this article is to analyze public comments made about WikiLeaks in three online publications (The New York Times, The Guardian, and Ynet) within the context of online user generated content in a widespread public debate. The article also addresses "the deliberative democracy theory" originating in the early twentieth century as it relates to modern theory of agnostic pluralism, this contrast addresses how consensus reflects hegemony and disagreement reflects or promotes democratic processes, as they relate to the public sphere.
Hasian Marouf A. "Watching the Domestication of the Wikileaks Helicopter Controversy." Communication Quarterly 60.2 (2012) 190-209: Web. 30 October 2014. <http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.lib.uwm.edu/doi/pdf/10.1080/01463373.2012.668848>
This article considers how the release of the 2007 "Collateral Murder" video by WikiLeaks had generated hope by those opposed to the war over possibilities of the video condensing public "dissent" and tangible action towards a US retreat from the Iraqi War. The actual results were a "domestication" of the war by the US government. Hasian utilizes rhetorical analysis in his descriptions regarding how our government constructs rhetoric as a way to anesthetize the public's perceptions of/concern over war. His article breaks down these rhetorical techniques into various parts which are a " . . . "part of the larger architecture of war rhetoric". . ." (Achter, p.65).
Lynch, Lisa. "We're Going To Crack The World Open. Wikileaks and the future of investigative reporting." Journalism Practice 4.3 (2010) 309-318: Web. 24 October 2014.<http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.uwm.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=2d6320c7-287b-40fc-a93d-d9829b5681d7%40sessionmgr198&vid=1&hid=124>
This article addresses how journalists and the press relate to WikiLeaks. Lynch discusses how WikiLeaks is introducing a new way of disseminating leaked information in the public and what challenges this presents to journalists. The article takes direct responses from a survey regarding journalists' initial points contact as well as their use of the website as a go-to for source information. It also synthesizes their opinions about the positives and negatives of "confidential information economy."
McNair, Brian. "WikiLeaks, Journalism And The Consequences of Chaos." Media International Austrailia 144 (2012) 77-86: Web. 30 October 2014. <http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.uwm.edu/ehost/detail/detail?sid=65a1e2f2-65fb-4789-8ec7-de4e85f2a7a6%40sessionmgr110&vid=3&hid=127&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPWlwLHVpZCZzaXRlPWVob3N0LWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#db=ufh&AN=79886894>
McNair addresses how the public sphere is developing globally and how this process promotes democratizing effects and discusses WikiLeaks' part in this process. He also calls attention to the transparent effects of digital media on governments as it relates to accountability and how digital press impacts democratization.
The central theme of this article is to analyze public comments made about WikiLeaks in three online publications (The New York Times, The Guardian, and Ynet) within the context of online user generated content in a widespread public debate. The article also addresses "the deliberative democracy theory" originating in the early twentieth century as it relates to modern theory of agnostic pluralism, this contrast addresses how consensus reflects hegemony and disagreement reflects or promotes democratic processes, as they relate to the public sphere.
Hasian Marouf A. "Watching the Domestication of the Wikileaks Helicopter Controversy." Communication Quarterly 60.2 (2012) 190-209: Web. 30 October 2014. <http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.lib.uwm.edu/doi/pdf/10.1080/01463373.2012.668848>
This article considers how the release of the 2007 "Collateral Murder" video by WikiLeaks had generated hope by those opposed to the war over possibilities of the video condensing public "dissent" and tangible action towards a US retreat from the Iraqi War. The actual results were a "domestication" of the war by the US government. Hasian utilizes rhetorical analysis in his descriptions regarding how our government constructs rhetoric as a way to anesthetize the public's perceptions of/concern over war. His article breaks down these rhetorical techniques into various parts which are a " . . . "part of the larger architecture of war rhetoric". . ." (Achter, p.65).
Lynch, Lisa. "We're Going To Crack The World Open. Wikileaks and the future of investigative reporting." Journalism Practice 4.3 (2010) 309-318: Web. 24 October 2014.<http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.uwm.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=2d6320c7-287b-40fc-a93d-d9829b5681d7%40sessionmgr198&vid=1&hid=124>
This article addresses how journalists and the press relate to WikiLeaks. Lynch discusses how WikiLeaks is introducing a new way of disseminating leaked information in the public and what challenges this presents to journalists. The article takes direct responses from a survey regarding journalists' initial points contact as well as their use of the website as a go-to for source information. It also synthesizes their opinions about the positives and negatives of "confidential information economy."
McNair, Brian. "WikiLeaks, Journalism And The Consequences of Chaos." Media International Austrailia 144 (2012) 77-86: Web. 30 October 2014. <http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.uwm.edu/ehost/detail/detail?sid=65a1e2f2-65fb-4789-8ec7-de4e85f2a7a6%40sessionmgr110&vid=3&hid=127&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPWlwLHVpZCZzaXRlPWVob3N0LWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#db=ufh&AN=79886894>
McNair addresses how the public sphere is developing globally and how this process promotes democratizing effects and discusses WikiLeaks' part in this process. He also calls attention to the transparent effects of digital media on governments as it relates to accountability and how digital press impacts democratization.
Comments
Post a Comment